Are recurrent denture-related sores associated with the risk of oral cancer? A case control study / Ha associacao entre as feridas bucais por protese dentaria e risco de cancer de boca? Estudo caso-controle

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the hypothesis that recurrent denture-related sores association may be associated with the risk of oral cancer. Methods: We conducted a hospital-based case-control study comprising 71 new cases of oral cancer in two hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil, and 240 controls without cancer, recruited from outpatient units of the same hospitals. All cases had histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma in anatomic sites of the mouth that may be specifically consi-dered at risk of sores by ill-fitting dentures. Denture-related sores were assessed by the self-report of recurrent oral sores due to the use of ill-fitting complete removable dental prosthesis. Associations were assessed by multivariate logistic regression conditioned on socio-demographic and behavioral characteristics. Results: The association between ill-fitting dentures and oral cancer was statistically significant in the multivariate model: odds ratio 3.98; 95% confidence interval 1.06 - 14.96. The specific assessment of association between tumors in the lower jaw and sores by mandibular dentures confirmed this result: odds ratio 6.39; 95% confidence interval 1.49 - 29.52. Conclusion: The potential contribution of denture-related sores to oral carcinogenesis still fuels controversies. This study reinfor-ces the hypothesis that recurrent denture-related sores may be associated with the risk of oral cancer. Results reported here also suggest that an appropriate application and monitoring of dental prosthesis represent a non-negligible scope for cancer prevention. .

Objetivo: O presente estudo avaliou a associação entre as feridas recorrentes por prótese dentária mal adaptada e o risco de câncer bucal. Metodologia: Foi realizado estudo caso-controle de base hospitalar que incluiu 71 pacientes com câncer bucal atendidos em dois hospitais da cidade de São Paulo, Brasil. O grupo controle foi composto por 240 pacientes sem câncer, atendidos em ambulatórios diversos dos mesmos hospitais. Todos os casos receberam diagnóstico histológico de carcinoma epidermoide em localizações anatômicas da boca sujeitas a feridas pelo uso de prótese mal adaptada. As feridas decorrentes do uso de prótese mal adaptada foram avaliadas por meio do autorrelato dos pacientes. A análise utilizou modelos de regressão logística não condicional multivariada. Resultados: A associação entre feridas por prótese mal-adaptada e câncer de boca mostrou-se estatisticamente significante no modelo multivariado: OR 3.98; IC95% 1.06 - 14.96. A avaliação específica dos tumores da mucosa inferior confirmou esse resultado (OR 6.39; IC95% 1.49 - 29.52). Conclusão: A contribuição do uso de próteses mal-adaptadas para a carcinogênese bucal ainda é controversa. O presente estudo confirma a hipótese de que as feridas recorrentes pelo uso de próteses mal-adaptadas podem estar associadas ao risco de câncer bucal. Os resultados encontrados sugerem que a avaliação profissional regular das próteses dentárias pode ser importante para a prevenção do câncer. .

Are recurrent denture-related sores associated with the risk of oral cancer? A case control study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the hypothesis that recurrent denture-related sores association may be associated with the risk of oral cancer. METHODS: We conducted a hospital-based case-control study comprising 71 new cases of oral cancer in two hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil, and 240 controls without cancer, recruited from outpatient units of the same hospitals. All cases had histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma in anatomic sites of the mouth that may be specifically consi-dered at risk of sores by ill-fitting dentures. Denture-related sores were assessed by the self-report of recurrent oral sores due to the use of ill-fitting complete removable dental prosthesis. Associations were assessed by multivariate logistic regression conditioned on socio-demographic and behavioral characteristics. RESULTS: The association between ill-fitting dentures and oral cancer was statistically significant in the multivariate model: odds ratio 3.98; 95% confidence interval 1.06 - 14.96. The specific assessment of association between tumors in the lower jaw and sores by mandibular dentures confirmed this result: odds ratio 6.39; 95% confidence interval 1.49 - 29.52. CONCLUSION: The potential contribution of denture-related sores to oral carcinogenesis still fuels controversies. This study reinfor-ces the hypothesis that recurrent denture-related sores may be associated with the risk of oral cancer. Results reported here also suggest that an appropriate application and monitoring of dental prosthesis represent a non-negligible scope for cancer prevention.

[Consumption of animal-derived foods and mouth and oropharyngeal cancer]. / Consumo de alimentos de origem animal e câncer de boca e orofaringe.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the relationship between animal-derived foods and mouth and oropharyngeal cancer. METHODS: Hospital-based case-control study matched by sex and age (± 5 years) with data collected between July of 2006 and June of 2008. The sample contained 296 patients with mouth and oropharyngeal cancer and 296 patients without a cancer history who were treated in four hospitals in the City of São Paulo, State of São Paulo, Brazil. A semistructured questionnaire was administered to collect data regarding socioeconomic condition and harmful habits (tobacco and alcoholic beverage consumption). To assess eating habits, a qualitative questionnaire that asked about the frequency of food consumption was used. The analysis was rendered by means of multivariate logistic regression models that considered the existing hierarchy among the characteristics studied. RESULTS: Among foods of animal origin, frequent consumption of beef (OR = 2.73; CI95% = 1.27-5.87; P < 0.001), bacon (OR = 2.48; CI95% = 1.30-4.74; P < 0.001) and eggs (OR = 3.04; CI95% = 1.51-6.15; P < 0.001) was linked to an increased risk of mouth and oropharyngeal cancer, in both the univariate and multivariate analyses. Among dairy products, milk showed a protective effect against the disease (OR = 0.41; CI95% = 0.21-0.82; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study affirms the hypothesis that animal-derived foods can be etiologically linked to mouth and oropharyngeal cancer. This information can guide policies to prevent these diseases, generating public health benefits.

Do tobacco and alcohol modify protective effects of diet on oral carcinogenesis?

Recent systematic reviews concluded that the frequent consumption of fruits and vegetables is inversely associated with the risk of oral cancer. We assessed this association, specifically comparing results obtained to nonsmokers and smokers, as well to nondrinkers and drinkers. We conducted a case-control study involving 296 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (cases) attended in 3 major hospitals of São Paulo, Brazil, paired with 296 controls, recruited from outpatient units of the same hospitals. Multivariate models assessed the effect of fruits and salads according to smoking and drinking. The intake of fruit was associated with the prevention of the disease in the specific assessment among light [odds ratio (OR) = 0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.27-0.78) and heavy (OR = 0.30; 95% CI = 0.14-0.65) smokers. The same was observed for vegetables consumption. For nonsmokers, no fruit (OR = 50; 95% CI = 0.22-1.12) or vegetable (for tomato, OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.31-0.93) was associated with reduced risk of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Similar results were found in the stratified analysis according to drinking status with OR = 0.51 (95% CI = 0.30-0.87) and 0.18 for fruits (95% CI = 0.07-0.45), respectively, for light and heavy drinkers. This observation suggests that the protective effect of fruit and salad intake may modulate the deleterious effects from tobacco and alcohol.

Consumo de alimentos de origem animal e câncer de boca e orofaringe / Consumption of animal Consumption of animalderived oropharyngeal cancer

Objetivo. Avaliar a relação entre alimentos de origem animal e câncer de boca e orofaringe.Métodos. Estudo caso-controle, de base hospitalar, pareado por sexo e idade (± 5 anos) coma coleta de dados realizada entre julho de 2006 e junho de 2008. A amostra foi composta por296 pacientes com câncer de boca e orofaringe e 296 pacientes sem histórico de câncer atendidosem quatro hospitais da cidade de São Paulo (SP), Brasil. Foi aplicado um questionário semiestruturado,para a coleta de dados relativos à condição socioeconômica e aos hábitos deletérios(tabaco e bebidas alcoólicas). Para avaliação do consumo alimentar, utilizou-se um questionáriode frequência alimentar qualitativo. A análise se deu por meio de modelos de regressão logísticamultivariada, que consideraram a hierarquia existente entre as características estudadas.Resultados. Entre os alimentos de origem animal, o consumo frequente de carne bovina(OR = 2,73; IC95% = 1,27–5,87; P < 0,001), bacon (OR = 2,48; IC95% = 1,30–4,74;P < 0,001) e ovos (OR = 3,04; IC95% = 1,51–6,15; P < 0,001) estava relacionado ao aumentono risco de câncer de boca e orofaringe, tanto na análise univariada quanto na multivariada.Entre os laticínios, o leite apresentou efeito protetor contra a doença (OR = 0,41; IC95% =0,21–0,82; P < 0,001).Conclusões. O presente estudo sustenta a hipótese de que alimentos de origem animalpodem estar relacionados à etiologia do câncer de boca e orofaringe. Essa informação podeorientar políticas preventivas contra a doença, gerando benefícios para a saúde pública.

Objective. Evaluate the relationship between animal-derived foods and mouth andoropharyngeal cancer.Methods. Hospital-based case-control study matched by sex and age (± 5 years) withdata collected between July of 2006 and June of 2008. The sample contained 296 patientswith mouth and oropharyngeal cancer and 296 patients without a cancer history who weretreated in four hospitals in the City of São Paulo, State of São Paulo, Brazil. A semistructuredquestionnaire was administered to collect data regarding socioeconomic condition andharmful habits (tobacco and alcoholic beverage consumption). To assess eating habits,a qualitative questionnaire that asked about the frequency of food consumption wasused. The analysis was rendered by means of multivariate logistic regression models thatconsidered the existing hierarchy among the characteristics studied.Results. Among foods of animal origin, frequent consumption of beef (OR = 2.73;CI95% = 1.27–5.87; P < 0.001), bacon (OR = 2.48; CI95% = 1.30–4.74; P < 0.001) andeggs (OR = 3.04; CI95% = 1.51–6.15; P < 0.001) was linked to an increased risk ofmouth and oropharyngeal cancer, in both the univariate and multivariate analyses.Among dairy products, milk showed a protective effect against the disease (OR =0.41; CI95% = 0.21–0.82; P < 0.001).Conclusions. This study affirms the hypothesis that animal-derived foods can beetiologically linked to mouth and oropharyngeal cancer. This information can guidepolicies to prevent these diseases, generating public health benefits.

Food restrictions of patients who are undergoing treatment for oral and oropharyngeal cancer.

PURPOSE: Oral squamous cell carcinoma and its treatment are associated with facial disfigurement and functional inabilities that may lead to malnutrition or under nourishment. This study assessed the incidence of food restrictions in patients undergoing treatment for oral and oropharyngeal cancer. METHOD: We interviewed 120 patients in two hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil, using a structured food frequency questionnaire comprising the most commonly consumed foods in Brazil. This questionnaire was applied twice; the first time to inform dietary patterns prior to the diagnosis of cancer and the second time to assess recent modifications of diet that were associated with the disease and its treatment. Hospital files provided information on clinical status. Multivariate Poisson regression models assessed covariates with prognostic value. RESULTS: One third of patients suffered major food restrictions (i.e., they reduced substantially the intake of more than 50% of the most commonly consumed food items before the diagnosis); 39% suffered a less severe condition (they could not eat less than 50% of the most commonly consumed food items before the diagnosis, and they needed changes in food preparation). Larger tumour size (adjusted incidence ratio IR = 1.45), posterior location (IR = 1.33), radiotherapy (IR = 1.84), loss of tongue mobility (IR = 1.36) and loss of teeth (IR = 1.25) in the surgery were associated significantly with the study outcome. CONCLUSION: This study identified clinical predictors of food restrictions in patients undergoing treatment for oral and oropharyngeal cancer. This knowledge may contribute to improve patient care and management, and to develop interventions aimed at preventing nutritional depletion of these patients.

Cumulative coffee consumption and reduced risk of oral and oropharyngeal cancer.

We examined the association between coffee consumption and oral cancer in a hospital-based case-control study comprising 143 patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma attended at 3 major hospitals in Sao Paulo, Brazil, and 240 controls without cancer, recruited from outpatient units of the same hospitals and matched with cases by sex and age. Associations were assessed by multivariate logistic regression conditioned on sociodemographic and behavioral characteristics. Tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking, and higher intake of bacon and deep-fried foods were directly related to disease; the inverse was observed to family income and salad intake. Coffee consumption and tobacco smoking were partially correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.14 among cases, 0.31 among controls). When adjusted for all covariates, a cumulative coffee consumption higher than 18.0 daily liters × year during lifetime was indicated to be protective against disease (adjusted odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.94, P = 0.037). This observation may have pharmacological implications for clinical medication of these cancers and is relevant to programs aimed at reducing the burden of disease.